the couple together to buy a suite girlfriend broke up requirements “equally”

the the court to identify most of the purchase cost is assumed the man, sentenced to the room to the man, but to compensate for the woman 250 000

small couple in love, was admitted together to buy a house, the decoration are good, the girl suddenly proposed to break up, and opening to win a house property rights, to the man the equivalent of half of the money value of the house as compensation. The boy told the court that house most of the money out, the girl only a little money, and the girls want to break up, because she fell in love with someone else, do not agree with the requirements of the girls. Court identified, most of the money is indeed out by the boys, considering both the size of the contribution made by housing ownership, judgment housing property owned by the boy, the boy pay the girl discount compensation of 250,000 yuan.

Daniel Lee claimed that the United States, the second half of 2007, she and Fang Wenjiang established relationship, in September 2010, they co-funded the purchase of a house, and picking up real estate license in October the same year. Buy process, she invested 243,000 yuan. After the delivery of the house, the father decoration workers on the housing of the stucco and the acquisition of a simple desk and other furniture, after which they moved to live in the house. Later, because the two sides in the life and values ​​on a big gap between, she told Fang Wenjiang break up, ask the court to sentence a house owned by all, she is willing to give half of the value of a house in Fang Wenjiang as compensation.

Fangwen Jiang argued that the house is indeed their shared buy the total cost of more than 160 million, Charles Li, the United States only 10 million, did not give a penny. 10 yuan of money borrowed with my colleagues, not Daniel Lee gave. They did break up, break up reason is not, as Charles Li says is the problem of outlook on life values, but because Daniel Lee America changed jobs fell in love with someone else.

Baixia District Court, the house is Fang Wenjiang to find an intermediary to buy the company. Fangwen Jiang’s father gave him more than 1.4 million buyers, agency fee 5000 yuan, and the housing transfer taxes are borne by Fang Wenjiang. Charles Li, the United States and the the Fang Wenjiang former couple, now both sides have been non-existent relationship, and therefore support the idea of ​​Daniel Lee US request to split ownership housing. Considered most of the purchase cost funded by Fang Wenjiang Fangwen Jiang is also the actual residential use from the convenience of life, balancing the interests of the point of view, the housing ownership awarded to Fang Wenjiang given by Fang Wenjiang Daniel Lee US appropriate compensation. For the amount of compensation, consider the size of the contribution made by housing ownership, the two sides to take care of the actual needs of the total people living, as well as home buying market value changes, etc., and payment by Fang Wenjiang Daniel Lee America discount compensation of 250,000 yuan.

(In this paper, the parties are not his real name)

correspondent white France

Yangzi Evening News reporter Luo Shuangjiang

– judges say

couple is different from the unfair equipartition property when couples break up

belong to the relationship between male and female friends, the two sides split the total of the division of property made during this period with general matrimonial property, family common property should be different. Matrimonial property, family common property are generally common factors of life and contribution to the common property is often not just simply by the size of the funds raised to distinguish between couples or a family member in the process of living together, for the family money and should be considered than income contribution for the segmentation of such common property should be in equal amount of principle. In that case, the parties actually purchase, now there is no evidence that the two sides have to live together in order to marry, even if the two sides split once common life, common life time is relatively short. In addition to the direct contribution, both for the acquisition of common property, it is difficult to have other contributions. Therefore, if taken equal split on both sides who made the contribution of property interests is clearly unbalanced. Funded share split, it is the subversion of the total common system, the same will lead to the imbalance between the interests of both sides is clearly unfair. So, on the two sides did not dispute the basis of the amount of contribution, on both sides there was no sufficient evidence to prove controversial 10 million funded by its own premise, the sum of 100,000 yuan doubts about the benefits attributed to Charles Li, the United States, to give judgment Fangwen Jiang Daniel Lee America 25 million in compensation.