core Tip: was the execution of the written order issued on November 16, 2011, but the court was written on November 16, 2001, Prior to this, the instruments of the case expression there have been a mistake. The presiding judge in that case, the Xinzhou District, Zhu City, President of the Court Liu industry publicly acknowledged the error will go to the parties to the house door to apologize and request understanding.
picture shows the wrong time of the execution ruling. Reporter Tang Huaming photo
WASHINGTON was the execution of the written order issued on November 16, 2011, Xinzhou District, but Zhu city court written November 16, 2001. that time we did not involved, my family compensation according to law a few million, relatives and friends are a joke to our family involved in the four years ahead of schedule. “Yesterday, just to pay compensation in accordance with the law in the new Island residents Cheng Xinhua angrily complained to the reporter.yesterday afternoon, this reporter went to New Island Zhu city charter village seven groups to see that two error of judgment, a ruling of 21 August 2006 the new Island Zhu City error correction by the court to correct the same year 8 September wording error, will be jointly and severally liable “jointly and severally liable” mistaken for “compensation. Another is the execution of the written order issued on November 16, 2011, but the court was written on November 16, 2001. According to reports, the evening of 24 November 2005, the City of New Island Zhu surnamed Zhang, youth, driving Cheng Xinhua stacked aggregates reactor had an accident, causing death on the spot. In August 2006, the new Island Zhu City trial court and ordered to Cheng Xinhua and other compensation for economic losses of the families of the deceased.
Cheng Xinhua said, a matter of law, I must abide by. August 9, 2006, the court decision I have to compensate the other party for compensation for death and emotional damages. But after less than two weeks, received August 21 Zhu city court ruling, said that the judgment of August 9, 2006 clerical error. Involved to compensate the losses to others, I really did not ability to pay, lost part of the after dragging a few years. Until November last year, the other to re-apply to my home once again received the execution of the court ruling, but the ruling was actually November 16, 2001.
Cheng Xinhua and his wife, said the case had been settled, the compensation money paid out. However, the work of court staff are not serious, people the very idea. Only to find that date and the wording wrong, but if it is legal facts wrong? That is not to be wronged a good man?Yesterday afternoon, the reporter linked to the case’s presiding judge Cheng Xinhua President of the Court of Xinzhou District, Zhu City Liu industry. President Liu Cheng Xinhua cases have been closed, the parties are very satisfied. When reporters asked about the matter of the judgment error, Liu President did not know, later verified to know the error. He said Cheng Xinhua cases instruments expression, there were two errors, one was “jointly and severally liable” mistaken for “compensation for the joint and several liability”, the wording is not rigorous, we promptly corrected. The other is wrong November 16, 2011 to November 16, 2001 “. It does not affect the fairness of the case itself, but the court staff to clerical error is inexcusable, as Zhu City, President of the Court and the case the trial judge, open to admit its mistakes, home to Cheng Xinhua door to apologize to request understanding.
, NetEase community news