yesterday, Han partners, publishers released, said Lu Jinbo, Han Fang question via the Internet, “ghostwriter”, causing damage to its reputation, Han has been a lawyer the same day, filed suit in Shanghai. He also revealed that Han Fang intends to claim the 2000 yuan, 2000 yuan after that not have any disciplinary effect, to 10 million. Han will be updated today, the last article that questioned the event of Fang’s approach. Fang said in an interview, the court sentenced by the court is not who wins the war of words, “My analysis will of course in the end, and will be 11 published on the Internet, the Internet is the main battlefield.”

manuscript identification card innocence

Lu Jinbo interview relayed the views of Han. He said, on January 19 to January 28, the micro-Bo Fang continuously published in the “acting in Han Han,” “genius Han cultural and historical level,” “Han reward farce” and other articles, as well as forwarding, review a number of other articles, clear that the works of Han “ghostwriting,” “navy,” “packaging.”

“Han was part of the response provides some facts from the evidence of other staff also provided some evidence of a wider spread on the network, all of these responses, in particular, pointed out some obvious facts and logic errors Fang’s remarks , Fang were not being used. “Lu Jinbo that works for their own hands in order to prove creation, Han organize their own from 1997 to 2000 manuscripts, communications, and other information in this material, a total of approximately 1000. The information will be notarized and authenticity forensic identification of the year, including paper, Han’s handwriting. These data prove that Han “doctor” “bookstore,” “cup glimpse” and “triple gate” and so are their own independent creation. Han also evidence to prove the new concept of the writing process and to participate in essay contest no “ghostwriting” “cheating” behavior.

Lu Jinbo, said Fang in question in view of the process, repeatedly distorted the facts, repeated misleading reasoning, arrive at the real situation is entirely opposite conclusion, and wantonly spread, constitute Han reputation and property rights serious violation, Han courts will require disclosure Fang correction, apology, compensation for economic loss of 10 million.

continue Posting exposing doubt

Fang Bowen yesterday, continue to question Han’s statement that there were several articles and self-contradictory, and insisted that the early Han’s article, “bookstore” “doctor” and other articles I have written is certainly not the Han, suspected by the gunmen to write.

in this “Comments Han and his father’s response,” Bowen, and his father, Han Han Fang Jen for all of three blog posts for review.

for Han in the “real joy watching the manuscript – with a 16-year-old to write Qingdong article” spoke about “humor” of the English word “humor” is the result of his active use of the dictionary, Fang analysis, Han claimed cooked read Qian, do not know, “bookstore” article on the humor of an argument is copied from Qian’s “smile”: “Let’s not forget the original intent of the Latin humor is a liquid, like Jia eyes of women, humor is made of water … “but claim that the check came from the dictionary. This can be as a “book” is not written by a Han evidence.

in the “really fun watching the manuscript – with a 16-year-old to write Qingdong article”, the Han says: “As I have several times before and after the statements do not, I and my father’s statements do not, these are innocuous little question, after all, 10 years later, who can remember so clearly in front of the computer’s friend, 13 years ago today, what are you doing? or even 13 years ago this month are you doing? “

Fang believes, before and after the statement of non-Han, the Han and his father’s testimony is also not on, is a major event involving Han’s life problems, such as the new concept of writing contest, “triple gate” of writing, good or bad language, etc. How can it be “innocuous little problem”? He said: “13 years ago today I do what I do not remember clearly, but I have done 13 years ago, and details of the circumstances surrounding the event, but I remember clearly, regardless of when the account will not appear contradictory to say If a person and their loved ones on a different thing to say, capricious, lies the possibility of very substantial. is such a criminal investigation police solve the case, the text is such a test, according to research. “Wallace had expressed support in view of Han, willing to collect an additional 20 million “ghostwriter” evidence, Fang said: “If Han lost, I can not find him and Wallace to 40 million?”

willing to confront

will be Han court, Fang said did not feel any pressure: “lost the big deal losing money, ten million or afford to lose, but never apologize, I do not think I have the wrong place.” He said in a statement: “I will not appear in court, my lawyer will go to the respondent, and I wish in other appropriate occasions (such as the presence of live no fans) and Han face to face confrontation.”

Fang believes that he signed Han’s article on the analysis, questioning, criticizing, is freedom of speech and academic criticism, Han and his team’s attacks on alleged violations of his reputation. He said: “The court’s ruling, whether or not in my favor, I do not think it will affect my analysis of the conclusions are justified. I continue to analyze the action will not sign any impact Han’s article.”

– related

new concept of the judges

will sue Catcher

(Reporter Bo Changwei) yesterday, Lu Jinbo revealed in the micro-Bo, Han’s attorney, also the agent for the “budding” new concept of magazine writing contest judges Liqi Gang v. wheat defamation case. Lu Jinbo said wheat fields in the “man-made Han,” said Li Qigang article writing contest manipulate the new concept of Li Qigang my reputation to inflict harm. Lu Jinbo abundant evidence that the case, the relevant case law will be “Han case” part of the evidence.

that he would be prosecuted, wheat responded quickly, he said: “on” artificial Han, “Mr. Li Qigang involved in the content, all from the network of public information. And, I forwarded the first time Lee’s statement, the first time in his article accompanying statement of the link; also apologize delete text, and the other accepted the apology and now there is news to sue me, this is some speculation it? wish, while the wind blows! If the Court I will respond actively and counterclaim. no reconciliation! “

now be sued, issue a statement the decision to re-question the wheat Han. He said: “New Year’s proposal for mentoring you, plus the lack of evidence, in line with the desire of the heart, even if Han vicious insults, I still to Han, Han Yan Jun, Li Qigang apologize, and get them to accept and now just getting in the road Speaking of Jin Bo Bo Li Qigang suddenly ready to sue me so again, counter to almost reasonable, too far, and I frankly face, and vowed to re-Han began to question, for in the end. “

text / reporter Bo Changwei

Figure / reporter Wu Ping Zhang