drawbacks Railway department issued repeated cases of corruption
this railway authorities to set up a self-contained judicial system, have great drawbacks, prone to the “son I trial,” their own side to review their own thing. “
In the era of planned economy, the various departments to strictly block management, in addition to the Ministry of Railways, forestry, aquaculture and other departments have established their own internal system the judiciary. Cross-regional and complexity of the beginning of the reform and opening up the market economy conditions, the railway department of criminal cases, gradually transformed into the railway transport sector still retains its own judicial system.
District Court, the Procuratorate, the reform of the railway before the court judges, the Prosecutor of the Public Prosecutor’s Office belongs to the Railway Bureau, preparation, funding, personnel responsible by the Railway Administration, and the railway system is “a person”. The railway authorities to set up the vertical leadership, self-contained judicial system, have great drawbacks, prone to the “son I trial,” apply on trial their own thing “. For this reason, in recent years the national “two sessions”, almost all the representatives from the provinces Higher People’s Court or the Provincial Procuratorate jointly recommended that cancel the special courts such as rail transport, placed under the District Court, the Procuratorate system, to avoid the railway the court to become an “independent kingdom”.
progress judge to respond to the new role of conversion
ability to adapt to the new role of the conversion, which is part of the judge’s concerns. To the challenge of work in the better butt after the conversion, many railway judges of the Court has now begun to consider the new charging scheme
railway “House” handed over to the place, means a judge of the railway system, prosecutors from the Railroad Bureau workers to shift to the civil service. Of that status change, brought about by a series of tests, the most direct, is handling the case pressure. Case Study of Xi’an city’s railway the court handling cases more than 140 people each year to undertake the case of about 300, and the Xi’an Intermediate People’s Court judges each year a person may have to do two or three hundred cases.view from the range of cases in the railway court in civil cases rail transport contract disputes, construction contract disputes, internal economic disputes of the railway system, the criminal aspect of cases detected by the Railway Police and the Provincial Procuratorate specified is not suitable for In the case of the District Court. These cases, the contents of a single relatively simple, related to railway-related, and a small number.
Despite the duties and scope of the railway the Court has not been changed, some systems have already seen the challenge after the conversion. A railway court judge, told reporters that after the conversion, feeling pressure bigger. Ability to adapt to the new role of conversion, which is part of the judge’s concerns. In order to better docking after the restructuring of the challenge of work, many of the railway judges of the Court has begun to consider the new charging scheme.
macro, News – NetEase Channel