picked up the lost girls, not the police, take it back to hometown in Jiangxi. Learned that family members reward their return. Such behavior is illegal? Should reward remuneration? On July 15 last year, Longgang, Shenzhen, pick up the child case, the police ruled that parties the Chen Moulan conduct did not constitute the crime of trafficking in children. Recently, Chen Moulan sued the parents of the child cable honorarium of 80,000 yuan. 7 yesterday, the Shenzhen Municipal People’s Congress went to Longgang newborn police station research, the proposed re-investigation of crimes.

picked up the girls back to the Jiangxi police identified trafficking is not

last year’s July 15th 17 am, Shenzhen Longgang Street, new communities.

5-year-old girl, Tong Jiajia (a pseudonym) ran out of the district alone with their parents separated, and crying in the street. Women Chenmou Lan, Yichun, Jiangxi Ji met her. Allegedly, she accompanied the child more than two hours after the child home. That night, Allison parents looking for the child. The next day, Allison’s father Mr. Xu posted notices offering a reward of 20,000 yuan remuneration tracing (after remuneration of $ 8 million).

Chenmou Lan said, the day due to heavy rain, not kids go to their parents. That night, she received the sister’s phone, his father was dying. Chen Moulan said do not trust Allison entrusted others, on the children back together Jiangxi.

The third morning, the husband of Chen Moulan in Shenzhen see the reward announcement, telling his wife. Chen Moulan then call Allison’s parents said the children in their side, ready to back to Shenzhen.

Mr. Xu

Allison’s father called the police.

the afternoon of July 18, the police found in Dongguan, he tried to return to deep Chen Moulan and children. The newborn police station on suspicion of trafficking in children Chen Moulan Detention.

police investigators, the rule of law, pre-trial sector review, Chen Moulan learned that the family of the missing girls search for the child, take the initiative to contact, and girls from Jiangxi back to Shenzhen, subjective trafficking intentional. Therefore, the police found and does not constitute acts of trafficking in children.

July 26, the police off the case. But the police, Chen Moulan although not criminal, but the girls bring Jiangxi, rather than active alarm or sent to the Shenzhen police station, government departments, the behavior is highly inappropriate.

cable eighty thousand remuneration refused to complain to lead the people’s deputies concerned about research

the Chen Moulan Why do not the police, do not seek government agencies to help?

she says, she does not know to the police. Newborn the police station deputy director Ye Yuanfei also said that the law makes no provision requiring citizens to encounter this kind of thing, how to deal with. Allegedly, Chen Moulan was also talk in a matter of picking up children and two acquaintances, and did not intentionally concealing facts. The police also confirmed his father’s illness, the husband is unwilling to children the fact that. Chen Moulan think they are wrong, and spent seven days in detention centers.

she has been to Allison parents ask for honorarium of 80,000 yuan. May Allison parents to know what was going on, refused to pay the remuneration. Allison’s uncle, Mr. Xu said, consider the Chen Moulan father fell seriously ill, willing to soothe the nature of some money. They believe that Chen Moulan if really want to help Allison find their parents, can be handed over to the nearby police station. In addition, it is understood, after the kids go to Jiangxi, Chen Moulan to give him the name, but also let the children call her mother.

the newborn

police station once about both sides to mediate. But in February this year, Chen Moulan lawyer to Longgang courts bring a civil action, Alex promised to pay the honorarium of 80,000 yuan. The Longgang court staff, said Allison parents have been filed to the Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court an application for a determination of Longgang objection to the jurisdiction of the Court. The case to be pending in the court’s ruling to proceed further. The case has raised to pay close attention to the Shenzhen Municipal People’s Congress.

In yesterday

, the Shenzhen Municipal People’s Congress, Yang Qin, etc. 7 to the Longgang District the newborn police station, to research the case, many problems. The core focus is to pick up child behavior is suspected of a crime.

focus of controversy

pick up the child case “exposed the legal blind representative called for re-investigation of crimes

the

Shenzhen Municipal People’s Congress Yang Qin believes that the case is the least logical doubt is that Chen Moulan picked up the children why did not alarm, what is the subjective purpose?

the

“Chen Moulan behavior did not harm a child’s body, but unforgettable harm to families with children.” Yang Qin said: “Do not say to take 60 hours, 6 hours to try this kind of psychological mentally the damage can not put into words. “He suggested that the legislation of the National People’s Congress should consider this issue. Such as Singapore and other countries, such acts are legal. If you picked up the child is over two hours the police for alleged illegal detention of more than 8 hours on suspicion of trafficking.

Yang Qin proposed, the Chen Moulan advocate honorarium of 80,000 yuan, exposing the profit-driven psychological. Fame and fortune of the premise that children with her. Encouraging the remuneration will be a frightening phenomenon. Therefore, Chen Moulan behavior intentional, illegal possession and domination requirements honorarium of 80,000 yuan, and the child as a profit-driven tools. Police should be re-filing, re-summons the parties to re-investigate.

police doubts

Although

behavior is wrong, but suspected as innocent and intends to re-survey

The newborn

the police station deputy director Ye Yuanfei said, the police did not find Chen Moulan child abduction ready to trade practices. Current evidence also proved that the child is indeed picked up, her behavior is wrong, but do not meet the elements of trafficking or abduction crimes.

he said, according to the current criminal cases investigation procedures, the police station is the beginning of investigation department, two cases needed by the branch of the legal system and pre-regulatory and verification link. Police evidence and facts on the basis of current understanding of the spirit of the suspected crime from the unprincipled, to make the decision taken off the case put.

Yeyuan Fei said the case had not to continue, as the investigation organ regret. Given the current case has triggered widespread concern in the community, the police will have the case re-investigated. However, whether the filing, according to the case whether there is new evidence and facts.

Case

Guangzhou to “pick up the child case”

trafficking guilty to avoid punishment

August 4, 2011 at 9 am, Shantou peasant Aling (a pseudonym) came to Guangzhou for only two months to see the side of the road unattended in a year and a half little boy, put him to “pick up” home. Husband scold, the day her child back to the police station, find child birth parents.

Yuexiu District Court decision that Aling arbitrarily killed children to take home, away from family care, constitute the crime of child abduction. Carole as a parent should knowing the correct practice of the Save the Children is to help as soon as possible to find the family, but she did not implement any help to find a family member or alarm move (its claim to the phone do not know to call 110). Carole’s husband, testimony also confirmed that its adoptive child victim of subjective intent.

In view of the crime after the voluntary surrender of, a true account of the offense, the child from the family custody a short time, and there is no implementation of the beatings, abuse and other acts, committed a minor crime, shall be exempted from criminal punishment. Carole did not appeal.