psychiatric appraisal to apply to be on the spot rejected

court received the complaint on the Hai sword two, four grounds of appeal, including applying for a psychiatric examination of the Hai sword; re-establishes the status and role of the Hai sword in crime; Hai sword decided to suspend the criminal incident, in the off detonator insurance mistakenly press the key to open detonation of explosives, constitute the crime of negligence explosion rather than the explosion of crime; sentencing overweight.

Hai sword defense lawyer read out on the spot Hai sword psychiatric examination of the application filed on behalf of the father of the Hai sword. The reasons for the request: Hai sword originally good-hearted, timid, has always been law-abiding, cherish life. But before the commission of an offense, disposition became pale and way of thinking and behavior became bizarre.

application also proposed Hai sword my grandfather because of severe depression in 1995, has two poison, and ultimately committed suicide. Hai sword near relatives of the mother’s side, there are many people commit suicide due to mental illness. Hai sword in July 2011, I dogged a serious traffic accident, I fainted on the spot, the brain has been badly hit. Clearly demonstrated in the commission of the crime, a manic mood, abnormal thinking, speech increased symptoms of psychosis.

Hai sword in a courtroom, I said: “I do not have a mental illness.”

cases prosecutors believe, Hai sword I deny that they have a mental illness, its counsel read out only the dependents to apply to, and did not provide the defendant with mental illness corresponding hospital records and identification results. Throughout the case, the Hai sword before the explosions, the production of explosives, invited associates, repeated test explosions, carefully selected targets of crime; crime, accurate detonated the explosives, driving a motorcycle to escape; after committing the crime of motorcycle smashed and discarded. All this shows that Wang Hai sword before committing carefully prepared, with clear objectives when committing the crime after committing the crime, self-protection awareness. Thus, there is no need for psychiatric appraisal of the Hai sword.

Finally, the court court rejected this application.

Hai sword family members look forward to the death penalty

trial, Hai sword defender Hai sword Department inadvertently explosive device button triggered the explosion, their acts constitute a crime of negligence explosion, a decisive trial are not allowed.

Hai sword raised in the trial, in explosives, he did not add any debris, reducing the explosives density, prior to the incident will be placed in the bank before the explosives from the original 15 pounds to 5 pounds, “I just want to bank car bombing, do not want to killing people. “

he expressed to the victims and their families apologies, but stressed: “I did not mean there is no thought of wounding not intentional detonation.”

also proposed

their defense counsel to prove that Wang Hai sword, who in that case, the status and role of all the evidence, oral evidence, Wang Anan and Hai sword testimony repeated, the judgment of the current over-reliance on testimony. From the strict view point of view of the evidence of the death penalty, did not meet the “sufficient evidence” standard.

Hai sword is the only participant of the bombings on December 1 last year and direct witness. In addition, including the prosecutor, to speculate analysis the merits. Not because of active planning, careful preparation, identified Hai sword does not exist to suspend the intention of the crime, it is recommended that the sentence outside of the immediate execution of the death penalty.

Finally, his defense lawyer, one of Hu Yanzhao America an apology in his own name to the case of victims and their families, said Hai sword is willing to help smooth out their hearts in a different way Hatefury and hatred.

on behalf of the sword family of Wang Hai: Hai sword can put a way out, willing to accept any punishment other than the death penalty.

ended, the presiding judge announced: In view of the significant facts of this case will be submitted to the Hubei Provincial Higher People’s Court Judicial Committee discussed and decided after the sentencing date.

newspaper Wuhan, June 13

, WASHINGTON social news